Have you ever heard about the vegetative electronic microscope? The expression, which appeared a few years ago, can cover up an innovative technique or a new approach to the well -known method of photography, but has a long -standing chaos that has an obstacle to what can be in practice.
The situation is that the vegetable electron microscope is not currently. According to everyone, it is a strange mistake in artificial intelligence, and at the present time it becomes a kind of digital excavation, as an old animal, and it is in the wrong place in the wrong place in the maze of the trunk.
The strange term appeared in two Iranian scientific papers published in 2017 and 2019. The thing may seem to be a calamity for the specialized observer, and between the terms “survey” and “Al -Khudari”, the difference in Persian writing is specifically one point (or rather a tone).
However, the potential writing error has now come out to itself. After 2020, it seemed more and more, according to the scientific researcher from Google, appearing in dozens of articles, and it appears that it has become one of the brands of Iranian paper makers. Since then, the nature of Springer has been published in an article that was withdrawn and fixed errors in the Elsevier Publication after infiltrating the materials conveyed by the editor.
Photo: The American Association for Microbiology
In the case of Elsevier, the affected article on the use of agricultural waste was protected by the electronic microscopy of the vegetative electron microscopy on the bacteria plant structures.
In addition to Iranian scientists, Nature Springer was withdrawn as a author of Spain Professor Rafael Locke, who was suspended in the spring of 2023 at Córdoba University. Luque was one of the most scientific authors quoted today, with more than 700 publications. The only problem in this matter was that he produced a superpower research, and according to El Paí, he published scientific results every 37 hours before the comment.
Even in the world of science “spreading or destroying”, this is a force of reality. By the way, Luque did not leave himself, as his reaction was as a real pirate leader on his comment: He said that the university was good on his feet and could say goodbye to publishing posts in Shanghai’s classifications.
Between the rows between the columns
Vegetable microscopy played an important role in the fall of Luque, where the Russian mathematician, who revealed forgery, Alexander magazine, who said it was a typical coercive language used to produce artificial intelligence.
Magazine doubts were confirmed by artificial intelligence researchers at Queensland University, who found that the term is really known to linguistic models. According to the claims, it was not then done in GPT-2, but it was already included in the GPT-3, and subsequent models, such as Openai GPT-4O or Anthropic Claude 3.5.
According to Australian scientific investigators, the error declined when the models were developed. As is known, when teaching language models, developers use all structured texts available, from Wikipedia to digital antique books. The holidays in one of these data collections, the contents of web pages that collect the contents of millions of GB CommonCrawlIt may have been created, but not in organized data, but during the survey, when the system reads the terms adjacent to each other.
Today’s vegetarian microscope is an expression of many programs that are thrown into red science programs for the safety of the text and originality. Currently, how many of these discoveries, but it is already clear that handicrafts like this are a new category of errors in human knowledge. The machine noise sneaks increasingly and inherits themselves, and the program candidates are currently trying to try the magazine magazine free science.
((Conversationto El Paisto Wradtemwatch))
Follow the index on Facebook as well!
