It produces twenty percent more greenhouse gases than burning the most polluting fossil fuel, coal.
Unlike diesel, blue hydrogen performs worse: when it burns it produces sixty percent more greenhouse gases.
I was very surprised by this result
said Robert Howarth, one of the study’s authors. The scientist also noted that blue hydrogen is widely mentioned as one of the options for reducing emissions, but the new scientific finding fundamentally refutes this.
The US Senate on Tuesday passed, with bipartisan support, an infrastructure development package that will include $8 billion for making “pure hydrogen,” as they also label blue hydrogen. US President Joe Biden has called the package a “key tool” in the fight against climate change, but in light of new research findings, this appears doubtful.
I don’t think we should spend our money on these fake solutions
Robert Howarth said.
In the United States, many companies operate for a variety of purposes “Green color“ – Created from water and renewable energy sources, hydrogen compounds in production And the test. Many say they are They could be a good alternative to fossil fuels, but not that but blue hydrogen could play a role in the regulation created by the US legislature.
“Friendly thinker. Wannabe social media geek. Extreme student. Total troublemaker. Web evangelist. Tv advocate.”